Keep It or Toss It? Evaluating Sources
Does
the source cover my topic? (Relevancy) |
Indirectly |
Superficially |
Right
on target |
|
|
Your evaluation | |||||
How
deeply does it cover my topic? (Comprehensiveness) |
Fluff |
Good
Overview |
Deep |
||
Your evaluation | |||||
Is
the material current? (Currency) |
No |
Yes |
Doesn't
Matter |
||
Your evaluation | |||||
What
is the perspective of the author? (Bias) |
Clearly
wants to sway the reader's opinion |
Author
appears to advocate a certain position, but remains basically objective |
Author
appears to be neutral, trying hard to present all the facts fairly |
||
Your evaluation | |||||
What "weight" does the source possess? (Authority) |
No author listed - Authority unknown |
Intended
for the general reader; the author is not a specialist |
Intended for the intelligent general reader; author may be a specialist |
Intended for a scholarly audience; the author is an expert |
Intended for a scholarly audience; source has been reviewed by the author's peers. (Peer- reviewed) |
Your evaluation | |||||
How
would you use this source? |
Throw
it out |
Useful
for background information & clue gathering, but would not include in my bibliography |
Useful,
but only as a secondary or overview source. May include in my bibliography |
Would
consider it an important supporting source for one of my points |
An essential source that supports one of my key points |
Your evaluation |
Author/Authority | |
You may not know who the important authors are in the field, but there are some clues to look for. Is the person employed by a prestigious institution? Are the person's academic credentials relevant to what he/she is writing about? Is the book published by a prestigious publishing house? Is the journal peer-reviewed? If you can answer "yes" to any of the above questions, chances are great that the content is authoritative. If you can't answer "yes" to any of the above questions, the source may still be good, just not topnotch. Check out the other evaluation criteria below. |
Bias | |
Everyone writes from a certain perspective and is, therefore, biased. However, bias can be charted on a continuum. Some sources are so biased that facts are distorted or ignored. Look for words or phrases that signal bias, such as, inflammatory or unverifiable statements. You are looking for authors who have seriously wrestled with the issues and who at least respect opposing viewpoints. |
Relevancy | |
While you may not find sources that cover your topic exactly, you should only use sources that are relevant to your work. Don't pad your bibliography with irrelevant sources. Does the source provide a new or different perspective? Does it support your position? Is it a viable opposing view to which you should respond? Is the information current? |
Comprehensive | |
Always choose the sources that take the time to carefully lay out the issues. The number of words is not the issue here; a two-page article may be more comprehensive than a 10-page paper. Look for how well the author has mastered the subject. |